Belief Revision And Epistemology
نویسندگان
چکیده
Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory.
منابع مشابه
BELIEF REVISION AND TRUTHLIKENESS In December 1977, a conference on ÓThe Logic and Epistemology of Scientific ChangeÓ was
متن کامل
Formal Epistemology: An Introduction to Belief Revision, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, and Conditionals
I. AGM Belief Revision Theory 1) The Elements of Epistemological Theories: Ch. 1 of [4]. 2) Models of Epistemic States: Ch. 2.1 – 2.5 of [4]. 3) Expansions, Revisions, and Contractions I: Ch. 3.1 – 3.4 of [4]. 4) Expansions, Revisions, and Contractions II: Ch. 3.5 – 3.7 of [4]. 5) Epistemic Entrenchment and Construction of Contraction Functions I: Ch. 4.1 – 4.4. of [4]. 6) Epistemic Entrenchmen...
متن کاملBelief Revision meets Philosophy of Science
Well, someone can decide by themselves what they want to do and need to do but sometimes, that kind of person will need some belief revision meets philosophy of science references. People with open minded will always try to seek for the new things and information from many sources. On the contrary, people with closed mind will always think that they can do it by their principals. So, what kind ...
متن کاملTR-2010007: Robust Knowledge of Rationality
Stalnaker provided an example of a perfect information game in which common knowledge of rationality does not yield backward induction. However, in his example, knowledge is treated as defeasible: players forfeit their knowledge of rationality at some vertices. This is not how ‘knowledge’ is understood in epistemology where, unlike belief, it is not subject to revision. In this respect, the Sta...
متن کاملRobust Knowledge of Rationality
Stalnaker provided an example of a perfect information game in which common knowledge of rationality does not yield backward induction. However, in his example, knowledge is treated as defeasible: players forfeit their knowledge of rationality at some vertices. This is not how ‘knowledge’ is understood in epistemology where, unlike belief, it is not subject to revision. In this respect, the Sta...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Synthese
دوره 122 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000